29
submitted 13 hours ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/linux@programming.dev

Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

00:36 Sponsor: TuxCare

01:46 KDE's AI policy

06:42 Existing AI policies

10:06 Going further on AI

12:58 My stance on AI

17:05 FOSS projects: yes or no to AI?

28:02 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nocteb@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago

You can be mad about that, but it has nothing to do with KDE.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Except that the KDE contributors would be directly supporting it financially and giving it training data.

Also directly financially supporting technofascists and oligarchs.

Also directly financially supporting the destruction of the environment, stealing of water and electricity from the poor, bribary of politicians both local and international, and destruction of communities.

LLMs run by corporations are terrible and toxic, with very few exceptions. We also can't have a good faith argument and not acknowledge that the overwhelming majority of devs use those corporate datacenter models and not locally run models powered by home/company solar panels.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Sure, it's an everywhere problem. But it would be nice to see more projects having strong preventative policies.

[-] nocteb@feddit.org 1 points 22 minutes ago

I think it is more important to leave people the freedom to decide for themselves. It's not an opensource project's place to tell its contributers how to work as long as the contribution fits their requirements. No one's opinion is worth more than the other one's.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
29 points (83.7% liked)

Linux

15035 readers
172 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS