this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1658 readers
12 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sitting on a fairly interesting tcon with Tourism New Zealand - looking at how visitor numbers are recovering (well up on last year, still a long way to go) and what's afoot in coming years (updated messaging, lots of face to face training with agents). Always good to get a bit of a longer term view
In the past, we have had high volume tourism. But IIRC both major parties have signalled an intention to move towards high value tourism (less tourists, but the tourists have more money).
My line of thinking was maybe the tourism was higher value, but it seems spending by international visitors was pretty flat last year: https://figure.nz/chart/OfFdbKzIdnKXFLx2
Yes, that matches what I've seen as well. My take on it is that the "higher value tourism" idea is pretty notional - it's a great idea but there's not a lot of strategy behind it...yet?
You're right. I think the move is simply a response to the public getting fed up with freedom campers and the like leaving a mess everywhere because of the high volumes.
Then they say let's move to lower volume, higher spending tourists and everyone is for it, even if there isn't an actual plan.