411
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

When looking at stats, you shouldn’t look at absolute numbers, you need to look at distribution too. According to google US is approximately 59% white, and 13% black, and food stamp numbers are 38% white and 25% black. So there does seem to be truth to if you are black you are more likely to be on food stamps.

Systemic racism might play a factor here.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So there does seem to be truth to if you are black you are more likely to be on food stamps

Sure but in context that should not matter at all if the question is what demographic is the appropriate choice to represent the typical US welfare recipient. In this case total numbers are more relevant than relative proportion, you'd want the median person.

More than 1/3 of just under 2/3 of the population vs 1/4 of slightly over 1/10 of the population.

Rough estimates

White on food stamps: 76.2 million

Black on food stamps: 11.1 million

[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That’s my point though, those numbers are meaningless. What if I gave you these numbers:

White not on food stamps: 122.6 million

Black not on food stamps: 33.2 million

There are zero valid conclusions to be drawn.

Analyzing the actual numbers, it seems a random black person is 3x more likely to be on food stamps than a random white person in the US.

(0.25/0.13) / (0.38/0.59) = 2.99

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Also, if there are 100 evenly distributed welfare recipients in a room, and you pick one at random, it is more likely they will be white than black.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Systemic racism might play a factor here.

Might? Centuries of being held down at every turn and prevented from accumulating generational wealth "might" be a factor in modern poverty?

[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Not everything is literal my guy. Try reading between the lines.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago
[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Holy shit lol this gave me a chuckle. Thanks for that.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
411 points (97.9% liked)

Not The Onion

22563 readers
1329 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS