90
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
90 points (83.1% liked)
Open Source
49520 readers
423 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
From their own documentation:
Just what I want in my editing software, the assurance that my saved files will mostly render properly when reopened in the same program...
This is exactly what will sink any attempts to do similar things, it's not the broad functionality of the software, it's all the billions of edge cases.
The LLMs will be able to get all the general requirements mostly right, and that's where it will stop. The subtle errors and bugs will pile up steadily as the codebase grows too large and complex for even frontier models to accurately summarize, and the people who vibed it to begin with don't actually understand what is happening, so they can't troubleshoot effectively.
Automated bug reports will pile up, agents will be dispatched in greater numbers, leading to cost issues and further complicating and compounding the errors in a bloated and convoluted codebase. The leads of the project will get burned out and abandon the project, leaving a giant, rotting, husk behind. Software that was forever, "almost working properly."
They aren't saying that opening and saving their own files corrupts. They are saying their psd saving is 99% the same as adobe's.
I know they are talking about PSDs, they listed it in their test suite. I read it as the test working for all but a few tools, but I guess they could just be talking about coverage.
Either way, it still does and will suffer from all the same issues I listed in my comment.
Most of these are very modular, so should be very easy to maintain. I guess we'll just have to see.
That describes how I feel about MS Word quite well.
If I had a dollar for every time I've encountered things in IT that "should be easy to XYZ..." That actually were a nightmare to deal with, I'd damn near be retired already.
And you're 100% correct about Microsoft products. I'll give you 1 guess what company was bragging loudly earlier this year about how much AI-generated code their software engineers are using.