457
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vitaly@feddit.uk 81 points 2 days ago

So there are some benefits to the ram crisis? People actually optimize things because of limited resources.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

When I was in computer science in college back in the 1900s, they told us that the USSR was responsible for some of the best algorithms still in use at the time (both for RAM and CPU usage) because they just had less to work with.

Guess we're all in that boat now.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago

This is still just a bandaid over running 10 copies of chromium for each electron app.

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 days ago

You know it's getting weird out there when Meta seems to be doing something that's actually useful.

[-] boonhet@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

They've been doing useful engineering things since the start, it's just that it pales in comparison to all the bad things

[-] morto@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

They only did a few useful things to be more efficient in doing the bad things

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

they ain't doing it for us, they're doing it for themselves.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Whenever big tech companies like Meta do useful things like support Overture Maps Foundation (which is also supported by Microsoft and Amazon) they are doing it to blunt some competitive advantage another tech company has, such as google in this case. They support open source insofar as they can't monetize whatever they are open sourcing.

[-] Guiorgy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

ZSTD and BYRFS, among many other smaller things, hello?

[-] Quazatron@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Necessity is the mother of invention.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

This is very true, cheap RAM and storage just lead to inefficient, bloated code.

[-] novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

Does it count as optimization? For supported hardware, it's certainly cool. But it's not making inefficient software better, it's making better use of the hardware.

[-] sekki@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

So using the back of a knife to cut something is not more efficient than using the sharp side? I would say making better use of hardware is also an efficiency gain. You use the same hardware to do more, while not driving up cost significantly. That is efficiency in my book.

[-] novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

It's not using the same hardware, this seems to use a special compression chip.

To me this feels more like the benefits of a CPU or GPU upgrade. Things run faster, but not due to software improvements. When people talk about things getting optimized due to the high RAM prices, I think most people are referring to software improvements.

[-] sekki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There is no mention of any extra hardware here though. The article even suggests this to benefit existing hardware like the steam deck.

[-] novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

In another comment, I posted a link to the CRAM presentation that mentioned a chip.

This article also mentions some hardware:

Because CRAM is stored in RAM and treated as RAM, with full cacheline/byte access, it can be accessed in a read-only fashion with little delay; just the cost of hardware-offloaded compression.

I don't think it would say that if they meant the CPU was doing the compression.

[-] sekki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah I see. It might not be a requirement though. In the case that the numbers are given with hardware offloaded compression it might just be slower when running on CPU. But I guess time will tell.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
457 points (98.9% liked)

Linux

68017 readers
788 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS