23
submitted 1 week ago by vermaterc@lemmy.ml to c/tech@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

Weird, because I do so multiple times a week

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So why bother if it's not viable?

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Never said it's not viable

It's just not an alternative for Photoshop

For super simple stuff is fine, if a little bit cumbersome

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

You literally said that fifty minutes ago.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

If you read the full sentence, you'll see that I didn't

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

in the category "viable photoshop alternative", yes

I like the tool, but anyone claiming that it's a true alternative, hasn't touched photoshop since 1996

Sure, Jan

[-] moth@anarchist.nexus 1 points 6 days ago

that sentence didn't say what you think it says at all

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

It's a viable simple graphics program

Not a viable Photoshop alternative

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
23 points (62.9% liked)

Tech

3460 readers
3 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS