Considering that there's basically just Dems and Reps on the ballots *checks notes* literally right NOW, and your post is definitely anti Democrat, I can only infer you want Republikkkans to be voted for an win.
Nah fam. A post specifically decrying Dems without also specifically decrying Republikkkans is obviously anti Dem, and pro Republikkkans.
I want to shoot and kill every I.C.E. member I see, but I know that won't work, and I didn't have the means yet.
So I'm gonna ensure that I never vote for the party that perpetually has 200+ votes every single time to ensure or raise I.C.E. funding. If there's a third party and they're the opponent, I'll vote em in (like I did with Nithya Raman).
The obvious pro-I.C.E. party is the Republikkkans. I will always vote against them. And always have.
Also, I understand mitigation, and I'm not a single issue voter, unlike the myriad Republikkkans in this comment section.
A post specifically decrying Dems without also specifically decrying Republikkkans is obviously anti Dem, and pro Republikkkans.
That's not obvious at all. In fact, that's a blatently false statement. It's an anti-Dem post, but I see no mention of support for Republicans, except from people like you, supporting their policies.
I want to shoot and kill every I.C.E. member I see, but I know that won’t work, and I didn’t have the means yet.
Yet you keep defending and supporting the people who fund them. Something about that tells me your anti-ICE rhetoric is unserious.
So I’m gonna ensure that I never vote for the party that perpetually has 200+ votes every single time to ensure or raise I.C.E. funding.
But you will vote for "the other" party that also votes to ensure and raise ICE funding.
The obvious pro-I.C.E. party is the Republikkkans. I will always vote against them. And always have.
Well, the Republicans are one of the obviously pro-ICE parties. And you may vote against them, but you sure are keen on voting for their policies, as long as the Blue Team is doing it.
Also, I understand mitigation, and I’m not a single issue voter, unlike the myriad Republikkkans in this comment section.
I've yet to see any Republican, or single-issue voter in these comments. Maybe you can point them out to me? But something tells me that you wont.
There's actually more, you should probably check your notes better.
By the way the checks notes bit is so played out, its come to the point even republicans do it. If you want to be effective with your snark then you gotta move beyond what wasn't even novel in 2016.
Considering that there's basically just Dems and Reps on the ballots *checks notes* literally right NOW, and your post is definitely anti Democrat, I can only infer you want Republikkkans to be voted for an win.
Thats not true at all. I had a few options that weren't Dems or Reps. In many races, you can also write in people.
Wait, so you are upset that they are against ICE, kidnapping, torture, and murder....? I'm not sure you realize what that says about you.
You can inferr a lot from what they said, but you are the one who appears to be pushing people into supporting Republican policies, not the OP.
Nah fam. A post specifically decrying Dems without also specifically decrying Republikkkans is obviously anti Dem, and pro Republikkkans.
I want to shoot and kill every I.C.E. member I see, but I know that won't work, and I didn't have the means yet.
So I'm gonna ensure that I never vote for the party that perpetually has 200+ votes every single time to ensure or raise I.C.E. funding. If there's a third party and they're the opponent, I'll vote em in (like I did with Nithya Raman).
The obvious pro-I.C.E. party is the Republikkkans. I will always vote against them. And always have.
Also, I understand mitigation, and I'm not a single issue voter, unlike the myriad Republikkkans in this comment section.
That's not obvious at all. In fact, that's a blatently false statement. It's an anti-Dem post, but I see no mention of support for Republicans, except from people like you, supporting their policies.
Yet you keep defending and supporting the people who fund them. Something about that tells me your anti-ICE rhetoric is unserious.
But you will vote for "the other" party that also votes to ensure and raise ICE funding.
Well, the Republicans are one of the obviously pro-ICE parties. And you may vote against them, but you sure are keen on voting for their policies, as long as the Blue Team is doing it.
I've yet to see any Republican, or single-issue voter in these comments. Maybe you can point them out to me? But something tells me that you wont.
There's actually more, you should probably check your notes better.
By the way the checks notes bit is so played out, its come to the point even republicans do it. If you want to be effective with your snark then you gotta move beyond what wasn't even novel in 2016.
K
Shit yourself to death.
K