308
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 22 hours ago

Considering that there’s basically just Dems and Reps on the ballots...

Thats not true at all. I had a few options that weren't Dems or Reps. In many races, you can also write in people.

...your post is definitely anti Democrat...

Wait, so you are upset that they are against ICE, kidnapping, torture, and murder....? I'm not sure you realize what that says about you.

...I can only infer you want Republikkkans to be voted for an win.

You can inferr a lot from what they said, but you are the one who appears to be pushing people into supporting Republican policies, not the OP.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world -3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Nah fam. A post specifically decrying Dems without also specifically decrying Republikkkans is obviously anti Dem, and pro Republikkkans.

I want to shoot and kill every I.C.E. member I see, but I know that won't work, and I didn't have the means yet.

So I'm gonna ensure that I never vote for the party that perpetually has 200+ votes every single time to ensure or raise I.C.E. funding. If there's a third party and they're the opponent, I'll vote em in (like I did with Nithya Raman).

The obvious pro-I.C.E. party is the Republikkkans. I will always vote against them. And always have.

Also, I understand mitigation, and I'm not a single issue voter, unlike the myriad Republikkkans in this comment section.

[-] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

People here don't need to be told republicans suck, they are aware already. On the other hand the site is full of brainiacs like you who think dems are saints.

[-] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

A post specifically decrying Dems without also specifically decrying Republikkkans is obviously anti Dem, and pro Republikkkans.

That's not obvious at all. In fact, that's a blatently false statement. It's an anti-Dem post, but I see no mention of support for Republicans, except from people like you, supporting their policies.

I want to shoot and kill every I.C.E. member I see, but I know that won’t work, and I didn’t have the means yet.

Yet you keep defending and supporting the people who fund them. Something about that tells me your anti-ICE rhetoric is unserious.

So I’m gonna ensure that I never vote for the party that perpetually has 200+ votes every single time to ensure or raise I.C.E. funding.

But you will vote for "the other" party that also votes to ensure and raise ICE funding.

The obvious pro-I.C.E. party is the Republikkkans. I will always vote against them. And always have.

Well, the Republicans are one of the obviously pro-ICE parties. And you may vote against them, but you sure are keen on voting for their policies, as long as the Blue Team is doing it.

Also, I understand mitigation, and I’m not a single issue voter, unlike the myriad Republikkkans in this comment section.

I've yet to see any Republican, or single-issue voter in these comments. Maybe you can point them out to me? But something tells me that you wont.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
308 points (84.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9515 readers
480 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS