15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
15 points (89.5% liked)
Kerala Linux Community
64 readers
35 users here now
A community for Kerala Linux Users. Ask questions, share setups, suggest tips, and help each other.
Rules:
-
No low-effort spam or repeated posts.
-
No affiliate links, paid promotions, or self-advertising without prior approval.
-
Keep posts strictly focused on Linux, open-source software, and relevant technology.
-
No political debates, religious discussions, or off-topic social arguments.
-
No personal attacks, harassment, or toxic behavior.
-
Do not post private personal information or malicious links.
Articles shared in this community may contain trackers or privacy-invasive ads. We recommend opening links with a privacy-focused browser or using broad-spectrum content blockers like uBlock Origin.-
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
I am not terribly worried. These are some of the most seasoned veteran engineers who have put in their time with hand-tools. They take quality very seriously. Just because Linus has the clankers chasing some performance improvements doesn't mean he's abdicating his stance on quality.
exactly! people are being so snarky about it and i’m just over here like “well i bet linus fucking torvalds probably knows more about this than i do”
Yeah, out of any dev on the planet who I would trust with using AI in development, Linus is pretty much the top of the list. He's not going to let any slop code in. It will be good, or it will be tossed, regardless of the source.
That said, there are still countless environmental and moral issues with AI.
They are and they do, but I worry about the volume of changes. More chat bots finding more bugs, more patches written by chat bots both means more reviews to be made. Which might be helped by chat bots.
All that wouldn't be a problem if the chat bots weren't regression-to-the-mean machines.