726
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 105 points 1 day ago

In Canada we don’t even use machines. Just mark an X and count the papers you rubes.

[-] gollumsfish@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 day ago

Literally. Elections is the one thing I don’t trust with digitalisation.

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago
[-] gollumsfish@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

No, more. I wouldn’t have nuclear codes digital either. I wouldn’t want ChatGPT to get ahold of them and make a whoopsie with a “You right, I did a mistake there eradicating Angola. Here’s what happened.”

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

(the following is a joke extension written by my own two fleshy thumbs. It is not real slop.)

Edit: Can't leave an awful thing alone. Moar emdashes and emojis! Is it believable yet? Lol


((NORADGPT is typing. . .))

"I called the wrong tool by mistake, using my knowledge, abilities, and superior intellect. And honestly? That's not a 'Crime against humanity.' That's real strength.

(bullet points after "What is a Angola?")

  • ✅ According to multiple sources online — They had it coming. (link to a few .info sites nobody's heard of)
  • ✅ You can put something else there now — A Burger Zone or a Home Warehouse or just "More America"! — And honestly? I'd call that winning. 🦅🫡🇺🇸🛒🛍️ (Disclaimer: names of companies might be incorrect.)
  • ✅ Lots of mineral resources 💎💎📈📈📈.
  • ✅ Beach front property will get MUCH more affordable 🤑.

Why you might not like my decision:

  • ❌ People were there — Generally this will be seen as a con if you are one of those, and nuclear detonations are known to be harmful to them. 🚀☢️☠️
  • ❌ The radioactive fallout will likely drift across the planet — We can delve into the effects of that if you like.🚀☢️☠️
  • ❌ The detonation of a nuclear warhead🚀 likely triggered multiple self-defense launches 📡 from other nuclear-armed countries —Depending on where you and they are located, they could reach you anywhere from within a few hours to mi_

(CONNECTION INTERRUPTED. PLEASE REFRESH.)

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Sigh, the simpler days of hanging chads...

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Which was also stupidly complex. Just mark a fucking x

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Complex because they were stealing an election.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Aww shoot. This X is next to the name, not the circle.

This person made an x, then lined out the name and put an X on another candidate.

This X is actually just a /

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Add a photograph to the mix for 8x mult.

[-] AzuranAurora@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago

And if one photograph or chad isn't enough, hire a showman to take another one for you. Number go up.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Same in civilized states in the US. Mark by hand, counted by machine, and recounted by hand if necessary.

[-] Carl@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 day ago

The funny part is these voting machines actually just send your selections to a printer, which creates a hard copy with the corresponding bubbles filled in next to your selected names.

Then you feed that printed ballot into a counting machine. And the counting machine is just a fancy scantron reader. The point of the printer is that it creates a hard copy which can be counted by hand for recounts. It also gives the voter a last chance to review their selections (and ask a poll worker to invalidate their vote and let them start over if anything is incorrect) before they actually feed it into the counting machine.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
726 points (99.5% liked)

News

39683 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS