738
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] la508@lemmy.world 51 points 3 days ago

I have two questions about this:

  1. Why do Americans use these machines? Just turn up at the polling station, confirm your name and address, get handed your ballot paper, mark it with an X, drop it in the box. Bish bash bosh.

  2. What the fuck is with that weird "news reporter voice" they always do on American news!? Just speak normally.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

1 - so someone could make money off selling them

2 - probably thanks to radio news and a stylistic choice that took hold

[-] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 10 points 3 days ago

America, more than ever, varies a lot by state.

I'm from New England. I vote in person because it's fast and easy. In my urban town, everyone lives within a 5-10 minute walk of their polling location. There is never a line and it takes like 2 minutes tops. It's a paper ballot, fill-in-the-bubble style. I had to vote absentee once: I swung through town hall and took care of it in like 15 minutes - same deal except it went in a signed and sealed envelope.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If you've ever had to grade a scantron test, you would know how hard "fill in the little circle completely, and only fill in one circle per question" is for the general population.

[-] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Eh. Big difference in motivation between high schoolers taking a test and adults voting. Also, the circles on the ballots are larger and spaced farther apart.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

it seems to work just fine here in Canada

[-] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

In many countries automated counting is not a thing. All interested parties gather in a room and manually count it.

[-] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

Because that voice and cadence is how you know that I'm telling the truth.............and am REALLY important. BruisedMoose, piefed.social. Back to you la508.

[-] jpreston1986@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The "News Reporter Voice" is actually an Ohio accent. Or rather, the distinct lack of an accent. Add in proper enunciation while projecting calm authority, and BAM! that Ohio non-accent turns into the News Reporter Voice.

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

There’s no such thing as a lack of an accent. All that means is “it’s the same accent as me”. To a Brit, someone from Ohio has an extremely thick American accent, what with all the rhotic Rs and such.

[-] jpreston1986@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

well, I mean, it's a lack of any specific American accent. They don't sound like they're from the Appalachia, West/East coast, or Boston, or the south etc. etc. A lot of American television news reporters came from Columbus, Ohio back-in-the-day because we just don't have a regional dialect.

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What I said still applies in the context of American accents. There’s nothing that makes Ohio’s accent the base from which others deviate. It’s literally just the one you happen to be the most used to hearing. To someone who grew up in rural West Virginia, your accent is quite noticeable, and their neighbors just talk normally. To them, everyone but them has an accent. Yours isn’t special in any way.

They don't sound like they're from the Appalachia, West/East coast, or Boston, or the south etc. etc.

No, they sound like they’re from Ohio.

[-] jpreston1986@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

No, I mean, the "radio announcer" and thus the "news reporter" voice was modeled after the Ohio accent, because it was seen as a non-accent. You're right that we have one, it's just so incredibly bland, that it comes across as not one at all.

Here's an article that goes into further detail

Vizetelly, who established a school for announcers at CBS, was concerned with maintaining the “purity” of American English. In his mind, the Midwest was the place to be—and Ohio in particular.

Vizetelly and other educators felt that broadcasters could evoke trustworthiness and objectivity by imitating the speech of the “heartland.” Eventually, when radio announcers and TV journalists began sounding like they were from the Midwest, the “broadcaster’s dialect” became understood as normal.

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Ah. I’ll grant that because it’s an accent that guy liked, it became a prevalent accent in news and popular media.

I’d still push back on it being bland, since that’s still just familiarity. Someone who grew up in rural Appalachia without electricity hearing it for the first time would find it quite thick and probably make fun of it and find ways to exaggerate it.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

What the fuck is with that weird "news reporter voice" they always do on American news!?

RIGHT?! It's quite bizarre. Maybe it's some kind of standard for maximum clarity or something. It annoys me too, just like "commercial voice."

[-] DrPop@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Not all states use voting machines, it's a state by state thing. The news voice I think is something they are trained in. It might be a holdover from the radio days and the "trans-atlantic" accent.

[-] pixelmeow@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That "news reporter" voice has gotten steadily worse over the years. I stopped watching news of any kind a long time ago partially because of how annoying that voice and cadence was. Every time I see any news reporting now it's all I can do not to take to the TV (or whatever) with a baseball bat. I can't take it seriously at all and it's so SO much worse now.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's getting right up there with "Hurried excited yet clear but stress-inducing YouTube-bro you've got to see this you won't believe it" voice. ARGHH.

[-] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We do it correctly in Washington State. We get our ballot in the mail, mark it at home, and stick it in a mail box or ballot drop box. It's amazing, and I remember being baffled when I learned voting in person wasn't obsolete.

[-] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago
[-] dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You need a valid state ID or SSN to register. Can register online, by mail or in person.

If you get an EDL you are automatically registered.

Easy peasy.

Source

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Despite republican claims to the contrary, you do actually need proper ID to vote.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
738 points (99.5% liked)

News

39710 readers
1687 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS