642

House Judiciary Democrats release 50-page report on Trump’s alleged involvement in Epstein files (www.ms.now)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

House Judiciary Committee Democrats on Monday released an unsigned staff report laying out what they call “the case against Donald Trump emerging in the Epstein Files and DOJ’s desperate efforts to cover it up,” with those Democrats now calling for an independent special counsel to investigate the president as well as what they describe as Attorney General Todd Blanche’s conflicts of interest and the Justice Department’s reluctance to share relevant evidence with state and foreign law enforcement.

“The women who survived Epstein deserve to be heard,” the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said in a statement. “Congress must have the complete files required by law, and an independent special counsel must investigate Epstein’s co-conspirators and DOJ’s cover-up and ensure that state and foreign prosecutors have the evidence they need to pursue justice.”

The more than 50-page report alleges that Trump was “an active participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of young women in the mid-to-late 1990s.” Although it also contains at least one entirely new allegation against the president, it provides no direct evidence other than the woman’s own conversations with Judiciary Committee staff.

He raped children, but the cult doesn't care. They like rapding children as evidenced by how many Republicans and church people keep getting caught raping children.

*Edit: fixed a typo.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 day ago

"Alleged"

Clown media

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

It's "alleged" until confirmed by a tribunal. Otherwise it's libel and you're getting multimillion dollar lawsuits against them.

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

His crimes/actions are alleged. That he's "involved in the Epstein Files" is not.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

The files can't be sued. The publisher can be.

[-] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Donald Trump was involved with Jeffry Epstein.

Watch me not get sued.

Obviously large media companies are at larger risk, however it's literally factually true that he was involved with Epstein. And the truth is an absolute defence against libel. So why don't the media grow some balls.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

You're a person, not a news org. And it sounds like you are asking them to override their legal departments to take on risk because you would find the immediate results pleasing, regardless of the longer term effects it would have on those companies.

[-] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

Yes that's correct. That's why I said the media should grow some balls.

I also work directly in technical legal risk, and I know what lawyers recommend companies and why, and they are the most risk averse people on earth. Of course they will recommend the course of action the incurrs zero legal risk.

Companies chose not to listen to their lawyers based on analysis of risk literally constantly. Just like they don't always listen to engineering, HR, or any other department.

Corporations don't get to shirk public responsibility by hiding behind their lawyers.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026

642 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31542 readers

3034 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News