88
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by zabadoh@ani.social to c/goodnewseveryone@piefed.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fizz -1 points 1 week ago

Yes it does because its built as part of the national grid with the nessesary planning and thought. Unlike dumping all that money into inefficient solar panels hanging off peoples balconies

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 week ago

Everyone is better off with decentralised solar. Less demand on the grid, becoming more self sufficient, less reliance on profit machines. Every home should have solar. Your attitude to this couldn't be more backward thinking.

[-] Fizz 1 points 2 days ago

The options are no solar or home solar. The answer is the government put up capital to buy solar on the grid vs government puts up capital and people put up capital to buy solar. This is less efficient overall, you spend more and get less and the outcomes are unequal. You need a grid, it needs to support cities and industry, it needs to be there for cloudy days. If you pay people to help them get their own solar that demand doesnt leave the grid but the recurring revenue does.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
88 points (100.0% liked)

Good News Everyone

4690 readers
164 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics & schadenfreude

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS