68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
68 points (85.4% liked)
Selfhosted
63253 readers
523 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
-
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
In principle, it's a pretty good "all-in-one" server, and I even wanted to switch to them until I checked the documentation and saw that the Community version doesn't filter
Fromwith valid authentication. This means that anyone who is properly authorized can send an email from any address on the server out of the box. In short, if I understood the documentation correctly, it's a decent option for hosting your own mailbox, but for even small-scale mass use, postfix + dovecot still wins.I do not think that this is correct. Otherwise multiple permission features that are part of the community branch would not make sense. Like "impersonate".
Do you have a link to the part in the documentation?
Unfortunately, I lost the section. But I've already been told that everything works correctly according to the tests, so I was just mistaken.
Ah ok. Was confused. Cause that would have made the community edition mostly useless.
Maybe you mixed that up with the Tenant System in the enterprise Edition?
Yes, possibly. In general, I was wrong.
P.S. very cool server, but it's a pity there is no analog of dovecot dsync in it. I had already prepared the deployment when I realized that I wouldn't be able to run 2 isolated servers with synchronization.
Yeah this is straight up wrong from my practical testing
Thank you. Apparently, I misunderstood the documentation. I will try to deploy it anyway.