1194
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nuclear waste can mostly be reused and what remaiin can just be sealed off, also, they are experimentig with thorium rn which is a LOT more safe; you also ignore that solar energy uses a lot of terrain

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago

And also the mining and manufacturing and disposal/recycling for the panels. They don't just pop into existence at the supply warehouse. Any full analysis should include the environmental entire manufacturing chain, regardless of whether it's solar, wind, or nuclear.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Should also included the conseguences of installing them: will it disrupt any habitat? Will the color of the materials/object affect the temperature of the zone? Etc etc

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

they are experimentig with thorium rn

For the last 50 years.

a LOT more safe

There's a reason why Texas bought 8 CANDU reactors.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
1194 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

89379 readers
4828 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS