89
submitted 18 hours ago by Zapados@sh.itjust.works to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Signalling, especially in another country, is not my specialty... But stateside (where tech can range from 2026 latest to akin to 1926).. there would have been a trackside signal that the moving train would've had to ignore... On top of the dispatch/comms screw up. I, like you, would have assumed there'd be some positive control preventing the trains from being on the same section of track or at least at high speed. Hopefully this will spark safety initiatives to improve signalling and train control.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

It probably boils down to costs, because passengers lives are cheap, sensors are not apparently.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2552 readers
1067 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great News Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS