116
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DjangoFett@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Do they have good people looking into it? The best? Really, seriously, nobody has ever seen people this good at investigating before because they're gonna find all the corruption?

Don't tell me about plans you hope to have, show me the fucking results.

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 1 hour ago

No. It’s their headline plan and byline to repeat while they DO NOTHING for 2 years, keeping the Republican seats warm in the meantime.

My partner told me in the same sentence as the blue tsunami news. I chose to hope. That’s gone now. Reality has taken over.

It’s going to be another crushing 2 years if the progressives don’t fight the Dem old guard. It’ll just be a game music off crush, quieter this time.

[-] DjangoFett@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 minutes ago

So look, I'm ambivalent right now.

Blues are incoming. This is better as at least things will stop getting actively, aggressively worse since Reds won't have full free reign. I will take what victories I can right now.

However, your entire point remains entirely undisturbed. I don't believe they will actually do much. What keeps me ambivalent versus bitter is that nothing has had a chance to happen yet. They haven't been sworn in, nothing but words have been thrown around yet. Talk all you want, I'll believe it when I see it.

People didn't believe AOC was gonna be anything. Now I'm not glazing her, but those same people also predicted she would fail immediately. All I said was she has to make it through her first term before we can really take a measure of the girl, and look where we are now. Those folks were wrong and she is a voice that people have no choice but to reckon with one way or another as she has a following and sway within it. Like her or not, those are facts.

There is a glimmer here, and I think what we can expect from the voting public of this generation is the genuine desire for not the same old shit. That's why we got Trump in the first place; he wasn't the same old fart who made empty promises. He came in with passion and common speech rather than boilerplate PC phrases and promised to change the status quo. Monkey's Paw activated on that one for those who voted Trump, but I am seeing that in the current vote as well.

Again, I've got no crystal ball to see how it will turn out, but the hope I once had has somehow limped its way out of the rubble of this administration. Doesn't mean it'll get very far, it just isn't dead yet, y'know?

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
116 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31749 readers
4017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS