39
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

I've mentioned before what the GOP could look like in a decade or two after Trump's influence is removed. I hold the belief that each Republican president will push further until one of them drops a nuke. Like, if Trump pulled his J6th stunt in 1993 to overthrow Clinton and install Bush Sr. for a 2nd term, Bush Sr. would've been onboard with tossing Trump in jail, right? And even Bush Jr. wasn't stupid enough to attack Iran. So with that in mind...

It might take a GOP president or two, but I think that a 764 (or equivalent) president is coming - a president so awful that Trump looks like a perfect guardian for your child in comparison. You know, a president who wants the destruction of order and society because he doesn't just see the US as corrupt and evil, but all human societies as corrupt and evil, and in need of immediate destruction. The rich would support this president's rise because the president would support the destruction of China, along all other competitors to American business, and would show some results during the campaign by adopting 764-tier tactics to murder innocent people abroad.

This president would view Trump's tendency to TACO as a sign of a Democrat plant in the Republican Party, and would promise to exterminate every living thing in Iran as revenge when elected. Then this president would nuke Iran and laugh when the rest of the world is horrified. And then nuke anyone who tries to retaliate, because killing anyone this president doesn't like in horrible ways is this president's goal.

Only way to prevent presidents like this from appearing is to make the US a better place to live. 764-esque organizations prey on the mentally ill and desperate, so making the US a great place to live will stifle their recruitment.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Mate, stop getting high and watching Captain Planet reruns. It's unhealthy.

You are talking about folks who are profoundly mentally ill and radiate malice. They might become a Steven Miller, but they could never get elected. It's like the same dill holes who think they are going to get elected ina platform of fascism and then suddenly unmask like muahaha! I've been a secret socialist all along!

And the James Bond villains that would need to support them are fucking morons. Musk is the closest we can come and look at how fucking stupid he is. And useless. He blew half a billion dollars and accomplished nothing.

If these fucking minty-fresh suppositories destroy civilization, it'll be by accident, not part of some Machiavellian plot. Someone will invent a way to transmute oxygen to Bitcoin and it's all over. That's the worst they can do.

[-] baronvonj@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

The current tech bros and Trump all legit seem like Captain Planet villains.

[-] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But I ENJOY the Captain Planet reruns! The Season 2 finale is amazing.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Why do you think conservatives fight so hard against things like science, education and universal healthcare?

Conservatives don't want a well-educated and happy populace. They want people miserable and stupid enough to buy into the kinds of narratives Faux pushes on those ignorant and desperate enough to fall into that spiral.

[-] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, and making people miserable and stupid just feeds into 764's numbers. It's awful.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Literal fearwanking but this sounds pretty cool to me if it actually happened. Humanity is a blight. Nuke the whole world, just don't do it for the wrong reasons (petty appeal-to-god racism).

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
39 points (95.3% liked)

politics

31775 readers
4840 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS