281
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
281 points (96.4% liked)
Privacy
51954 readers
1630 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Apples odd in that they are pretty protective of your personal information, as in they won’t sell it or lets 3rd parties come even remotely close to it, but have very little qualms in abusing it themselves.
Not even Google sells any of your data. They collect data and sell advertising spots but not the data itself.
Selling data only works as a business model if you cannot sell ad spots. That is why news websites have cookie banners with 1000 partners but Google, Facebook, Apple, et al. do not.
No, it's actually much worse than that
If they secretly let the government double dip, I don't think I want to trust any other claims they and their marketing makes.
Apple admits to secretly giving governments push notification data - Ars Technica
What are the odds that Google also claims it doesn't sell your data, it "shares" it.
But would you trust them?
Even Apple is going to listen to the government. They have done things to limit what they can tell them but most people don't use it. And to be fair so has Google it is why location data is now on device instead of on the cloud with Google.
All cloud operators are beholden to their governments.
I read that Apple was implementing ads in their maps software now. Quick search seems to confirm it. Below is a page blurb originating from Apple's domain.
My initial comment was just satire, but reading through the document I'm just... tired. This sort of analysis originates from America's intelligence organizations. It's not surprising that the technique's bled into private-business--it always happens. Intel. orgs. create a software solution that solves one of their problems and entrepreneurs within those organizations realize private-businesses have similar problems.
(I will state--because it's tangentially related--the matrix-protocol originates from individuals linked to mossad. I encourage users not to use matrix.)
Apples not odd. It's the same as every other technology corporation.
Are you referring to the historic link to Amdocs?
Ads don’t violate privacy.
Yes they do
Only personalised ads do. If someone pays to be shown ahead of competitors no matter who's doing the search, there's no personalization.
I would argue that it's bad in a different way. But also, I think non-targeted ads in the internet are very rare
If they were random, sure.
But they're not.
But can be a demonstration of a violation
Also can carry a dangerous payload.