254
I may have hit my breaking point.
(lemmy.sdf.org)
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
Less effective reports:
Sure, by an ethical/moral standpoint that works. From the legal standpoint, however, if I did that I'd be sued to the point where I have no option but to live out my life in prison. This kind of thing sounds great on paper. In practice? I'm not fucking going back.
You cannot be sued for doing your job badly. That’s insane lol
Why are you so scared? Don't sign a contract which tells you to do it as efficiently as possible. Just be incompetent. It's not illegal to be incompetent. Mark Zuckerberg wasted 1 billion dollars with his Metaverse shit and he's still one of the most powerful and wealthy CEOs.
That's called "weaponised incompetence" or "malicious compliance". If you do it right, they don't have any basis to sue you. Just fake it. Imagine you're just very bad at your job.
Capitalism often controls through fear. The fear of being sacked. The fear of being sued. In the end, the consequences for being bad are not as painful as you'd imagine.
Iwish I could bring myself to this, but I actually rely give a fuck and have some pride in what I do. I wish I wasn't principled, but I spent years as an apprentice to get to where I am at and I'll be damned if I put my name on shoddy work.
It's good work, though.
Except for this public conversation.
We're just clowns doing clown things. That's a different guy they sent the offer to. Why would it be their account?
No one said you're a good machinist. So you take 0.005 passes rather than 0.020 passes and set your cutting speed lower. Your rational is it saves your tools. No on is saying cut every thing dry. But that would work too.
Way too easy to fix and way too obvious. A competent machinist will fix this by just changing a single value. You have to introduce less obvious and more insidious errors.
But its not to train competent machinists. Odds are good it will be run by minimum wage slaves who know almost nothing about machining. Tfats what the ai is for afterall.
Yes, but if they find out the data is shit, an LLM or another competent machinist can fix it easily. I'd add errors LLMs can't spot, and humans take long to find.