256

I may have hit my breaking point. (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 1 day ago by lyrial@lemmy.sdf.org to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

104 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am ethically and morally opposed to gen AI as a concept. As far as the breaking point, let me explain. I've been a machinist for ~18 years. It's been really bad for the last 9 years and I've more or less had to live off of savings from the good years (those savings are basically gone).

I've just recently gotten legitimate job offers for ~$125 an hour remote because I own a CNC. The catch is that I have to record all of the CAM programming and machine time in order to train an AI to replace potentially hundreds of thousands of jobs.

This fucking sucks. I'd love to sit on my ass forever at 43, but I absolutely fucking hate the potential that I could bring that would crush the working class and elevate the owning class.

I wish it wasn't this hard, because I really do believe in socialism and have labored hard for a long time to make it happen - but there's a chance I can put everything I have into true anarchism cause and make a legitimate difference.

Please help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lyrial@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago

My problem with that is that if I do this correctly, it could mean hundreds of thousands of jobs from people that have potentially spent decades making a trade. It's harder than just me wanting money.

[-] helix@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

Then don't do it correctly. You're basically doing your peers a favor if you poison the data.

[-] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social -5 points 1 day ago

I might get grilled for this point of view...

The car dramatically reduced the demand for horse shoe makers. Perhaps you're lucky to be on the car side of the equation? Horses are still great, but most people prefer cars.

[-] helix@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

It's a good analogy because cars enabled globalism, more exploitation and poisoned billions of people with nitrous oxides, lead and particulates. Cars lead to cancer. We should be on the train side of the equation...

[-] waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

There is no side to be on, people will do the more convinient thing and cars were not obviously that dangerous and there are OBVIOUSLY positives to car use over horses.

Is your argument we should have forsaken any modernity since the first humans?

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026

256 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck AI

8774 readers

1532 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

Relevant posts only.
No bigotry.
No misinformation.
No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
Especially no AI advocacy.
No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
These rules are a living document that may change in the future.

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports: