227
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
227 points (99.1% liked)
Privacy
52043 readers
933 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS



I'm starting to feel sceptical to anything electronic
First avoid the major social apps. They are designed to give their companies access to your private information for advertising and selling, so of course these have lots of ways for nefarious attacks without user intervention since they aren't likely to spend money keeping them out. Also, wouldn't hurt to move to an OS that better isolates apps (like GrapheneOS) and avoid background services with administrative privileges like iOS or Google Services. GrapheneOS isolates Google services a bit or allows never installing them. IPhone has no real way to mitigate risk outside of the basics like encrypting your device and online data, but the admin services still have access. Not sure how easily they are hacked these days since they haven't really been promoting privacy anymore, but have also started wanting to profit from your data. Still slightly better than google, but way less control over the device which means you're at their mercy. I want even get started on Samsung administrative services...and I don't know the others well.
At some level, you have to accept that there's no panacea to the panopticon. At least, none at the retail level.
Ffs, flock cameras and facial recognition make even MeatSpace a shitshow of privacy violations.
Ultimately, the real defense against spying is irrelevance. 99.99% of people simply aren't interesting enough to monitor in a way that matters.
And that's the real point.
Make irrelevance desirable and notoriety risky and you've got a compliant people
even if 99.99% of the populace is irrelevant to them they are still going to collect the data and use it against you if they need to.
Massively easier to find/create relevance now that LLMs can be run against the data. Now imagine all the mistakes it could make.
We don't have to imagine, it's already making those mistakes. But don't worry, taxpayers will fund the settlements....
But also make notoriety a source of revenue and irrelevance a job security risk.
You'll get enthusiastic compliance, as evidenced by the last two years.
But you'll also get a groundswell of nobodies who are super pissed at you. All this surveillance is ineffectual when defiance occurs at scale.
When everyone's acting in opposition, nobody gets punished.
Those 99.99% of "uninteresting" people who make up the trillions of the Big Tech data market
You must assume that anything you communicate electronically can be traced back to you. Even if it's encrypted, if they just hack your OS and read the messages from a screen capture they can still access it.