cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/63197390
found this on some telegram channel:
In February 2026, an employee of Paragon Solutions published a photograph on her LinkedIn profile depicting the operation of the Graphite spyware. The post has currently been deleted.
Reut Yamen holds the position of Chief Legal Counsel and Director of Compliance at the Israeli company Paragon Solutions, which specializes in cyber-surveillance technologies. The company was founded in 2019 by a group of former employees of Israeli intelligence services — among them Ehud Schneorson, former commander of Unit 8200 (Israel's equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency), as well as former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
The post was first noticed by technology researcher Yurre van Bergen, who tracks the use and proliferation of spyware worldwide.
The image apparently shows a demonstration interface of the Graphite system. An operator can view messages intercepted from a surveillance target in various services, including WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Line, and TikTok.
According to the results of a large-scale investigation conducted by The Citizen Lab in 2025, in 2024 in Italy, dozens of journalists and private individuals were attacked via the WhatsApp messenger using Graphite. A "zero-click" exploit (one that does not require user interaction) was used for this purpose.
Paragon Solutions has (or previously had) contracts with U.S. government agencies, in particular the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
At some level, you have to accept that there's no panacea to the panopticon. At least, none at the retail level.
Ffs, flock cameras and facial recognition make even MeatSpace a shitshow of privacy violations.
Ultimately, the real defense against spying is irrelevance. 99.99% of people simply aren't interesting enough to monitor in a way that matters.
And that's the real point.
Make irrelevance desirable and notoriety risky and you've got a compliant people
even if 99.99% of the populace is irrelevant to them they are still going to collect the data and use it against you if they need to.
Massively easier to find/create relevance now that LLMs can be run against the data. Now imagine all the mistakes it could make.
We don't have to imagine, it's already making those mistakes. But don't worry, taxpayers will fund the settlements....
But also make notoriety a source of revenue and irrelevance a job security risk.
You'll get enthusiastic compliance, as evidenced by the last two years.
But you'll also get a groundswell of nobodies who are super pissed at you. All this surveillance is ineffectual when defiance occurs at scale.
When everyone's acting in opposition, nobody gets punished.
Those 99.99% of "uninteresting" people who make up the trillions of the Big Tech data market