511

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) has “been with the Republicans” since Congress returned, after the Michigan Democrat endorsed former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) in the midterms.

“She’s been with the Republicans ever since she’s come back. So she’s been on the Republican side of the aisle,” Ocasio-Cortez said during an appearance on “The Don Lemon Show” that aired Thursday.

“This is just the epitome of a certain kind of transactional politics,” she added. “And it’s really sad.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Much like Sinema, there are MANY of these DINOs who act as Republican sleepers, just waiting for their activation to inflict the most damage. Once that capital is expended, well, then time to be open Republican.

Schumer, Jeffries, Stevens, Fetterman are Sinema. There are many more (e.g., DWS in FL, and Gilibrand in NY)

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is why. Nothing will change until we get these traitors out

[-] overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

How are they getting elected in the first place? Are they making appealing campaign promises, then reneging on them or are they just put forth as “your local DNC appointed representative - what are you going to do, vote republican instead?”?

[-] saturnapy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

There's no requirement for politicians to uphold campaign promises, and no penalty to reneg, so yeah.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It's tough because the nature of a Representative Democracy means we should empower representatives to make decisions that we ourselves wouldn't necessarily make -- much like parents stopping children from eating candy every day. They should ideally have a full-time job of educating themselves, consulting experts, figuring out what is best for their constituents.

haha. Funny. I know.

But maybe there is a middle-ground where we can not keep them so rigid to campaign promises, but permit Recall votes at any time during their terms on any elected official -- even if the threshold may be higher at 60 or 70% to prevent too much knee-jerk reactivity.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Corruption can and should be treated as an act of treason to democracy, and should have legitimate criminal consequences.

The vast majority do not have a problem with representatives changing their opinions based on new information or empiric evidence. That's what is expected of moral and ethical leadership acting in good faith. The expectation is that there must be logical consistency, and actions must be based on attempts to do what is morally and ethically justifiable.

The problem is they don't even attempt to do any of that. They just lie to win and essentially tell their constituents to go fuck themselves. That is corruption, and lying only to defy the will of the people should be treated as the most serious crime possible in a democracy.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All conservatives are pathological liars. As crazy as living a lie would seem to a normal person, lying at all times is perfectly comfortable for conservatives. So they use that well-practiced skill to their advantage. A conservative will lie about what they want for lunch if they think it will benefit them in some small way.

Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation. Whether it's a politician, a colleague or dear, sweet grandma baking cookies, never trust any conservative. They are instinctive manipulators. Always have been.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's a lot to unpack on this but you've got gist.

At the root? America is just a very conservative country, and it has backwards laws on the books that only accelerates our downward spiral. It's made more conservative because the wealth gap has widened so much and billionaires and psychopathic corporations blindly pursuing profit only care about enriching themselves -- and they can now freely buy media megaphones and dupe the masses while simultaneously eroding education and making the electorate more short-sighted, easier to dupe. (Hence why Trump said, "I love the poorly educated" and "Smart people don't like me."

So the Overton Window drifts right; sensible policies that would be center-left by European or Canadian standards get painted as radical communism, etc.

Democrats as I noted in another comment below are timid because they're up against a more powerful force and partly corrupted from within themselves. The corrupt (and naive) have sold the party on the notion that, "Hey, we can never persuade the electorate. We can never compete with the megaphones of the right, so best we can do is be Republican-Lite, lest we're perceived as commies by the poorly educated electorate."

So Overton Window keeps being defined by the Right, so goes the country....

That is... Unless gas prices go up lol.

Edit: I should say there are things to be hopeful for. Talarico has a damn near AOC platform and just won Texas. A Sanders-backed progressive just beat Collins in Maine finally. A Medicare For All and Muslim just won the battleground state of Michigan. So the bullshit that progressivism doesn't sell and we have to cater to the blind has been largely debunked.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

For the most part there hasn't been much competition because they're the only ones who get funding from rich people.

[-] holy_scroller@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, let's go back to the small tent and get rid of people who only agree with us 95% of the time. Screw having a sustainable electoral majority. Ideological Purity Now!

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
511 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31898 readers
3413 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS