335
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
335 points (100.0% liked)
Fuck AI
8793 readers
2415 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
See, in this thing called ITIL, there's something called a rollback plan. This would also come with plenty of testing ahead of time, especially on very crucial systems.
Oops...
Claude told me it's not necessary, the code has been thoroughly reviewed and has no errors, as instructed.
Hey man.
fuck it.
I can't see this without hearing the drunken peasants podcast theme play in my mind.
On paper, this should not have affected anything. It was only to provide human-approved route optimization. Theoretically, a total failure should have been easily ignored, business as usual.
TIL that an outlook/365 bug that requires the user to open an attachment is only 6.5 CVE because it cannot execute itself.
.... Have cyber security people... met the average, median outlook/365 user?