33
submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nous@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That abstract is full of oh won't anyone think of the profits vibes.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I'm not seeing that, surprisingly enough. What makes you think so?

[-] nous@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

A new diffraction-gated real-time ultra-speed mapping technology threatens to undercut cameras costing $100,000 with off-the-shelf parts.

The threatens to undercut part. Rather than talking about how it is going to make things more affordable, it talks about how it is going to ruin the exiting markets pricing. At least that is how that reads to me. Note, I am not talking about the whole article - just that one abstract, which is what is shown here and leads a completely different tone to how the article is actually worded.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Fair point. The rest of the article is much better.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43502 readers
214 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS