this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
1786 points (97.3% liked)
Work Reform
10030 readers
474 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Don't use Indeed, dumbass. Talk to a headhunter. They get paid by employers to find you a job. Every single professional job I've ever had has come through a headhunter, and the jobs have been great.
This post isn't even about professional level jobs, dumbass. It's explicitly about someone who can't afford a car and applied for service/labor jobs.
I'll second the using a recruiter point, I've seen it help people with MBAs going for Director jobs or people without a GED going for entry level menial labor roles. Worse case scenario they have trouble placing you but you get a professional who knows the local job market on your "team" who can answer questions for you. They only get paid if you get hired, but they want to get more business from companies so they have a vested interest in getting you hired in the right position.
When I was recruiting I was more likely to give an interview, even if it was a courtesy, to a recruiter candidate than a direct hire candidate because I knew they were likely pre-screened and 20 minutes talking to someone who may or may not be a great fit was worth it to keep the relationship with the recruiter. So if one of the recruiters presented you there was like a 75% chance I'd phone screen you even if my initial reaction would have been to pass you over.
A recruiter can be especially helpful if you're moving industries or have a more "unusual" background (i.e. phd, foriegn work history, military - there are some great veteran focused recruitment firms in the US especially for JMOs) because they can help lay ground work and prep the interviewer on why /your/ unconventional background is actually a perfect fit.
It costs you nothing and some of the nicer firms will do interview prep and help with your resume formatting too.
If youre not sure where to start and are US based try Manpower or Randstad for decent general indutry full/part time recruiters. It's FREE!
My experience (as someone that does not fit most normal job descriptions) is that recruiters cannot understand anything beyond "square peg in a square hole" jobs. They dislike having to get to know me, understand what makes me special, and then keeping an open mind for every possible opening. I don't blame them - go for the low-hanging fruit first. But if they won't help me, then they need to say so.
How do I get in touch with one of those, in London?
If you can't find a recruitment agency in London I think you'll struggle with tying your shoes
Ah, I can, I think I must have been confused by the word headhunter.
Yeah the yanks will try to make anything sound tacticool