this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
217 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sammydee@readit.buzz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suppose it depends on whether the degradation is linear or if it plateaus after the initial decrease.

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So, how does that compare to silicon panels? And maybe it is worth it if they are easier, cheaper or more environmentally friendly to produce?

[–] Lantech@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

silicon panels drop at 1 percent a year

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I think that's the big idea with perovskites. You can potentially make them with basic chemistry instead of vacuums and furnaces like silicon panels. It's a bit of a pipe dream at this point to have ones that are comparable to silicon in long-term performance, but if you can print them like newspaper maybe that doesn't matter.