this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
11 points (92.3% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1656 readers
37 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think it indicates they aren't planning on monitoring people, but something more like real time monitoring of desk occupancy for monitoring if they have too many or not enough desks. I can't imagine a scenario where HR would not know about the intent to monitor staff in an organisation big enough to have HR.
However, things can still be privacy invading even if they weren't intended to be. I think it's worth fighting against privacy invasion even when (or perhaps especially when) it wasn't intended. Think of security cameras covering staff desks, intended to provide safety to staff but in reality make staff feel the opposite.