this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
937 points (95.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21041 readers
683 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    937
    i hate that it's very often like this (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 1 year ago by nekothegamer@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    241 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] nekothegamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    is there a way to make it work like a rolling release of sorts? i'd want to use debian, but i don't want to stay with old packages and wait 2 years for an update

    [–] Wulff@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    You could use debian testing. It's a somewhat "rolling-release" model. You will get more up to date packages with more stability too.

    You could also use unstable, but I wouldn't recommend it personally.

    Edit: if you really need the most up to date version of some packages, you can pin them to use the unstable repo. This would be a pretty reasonable solution.

    [–] lwe@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    You could just go with Debian unstable. I rarely ran into issues while running it in a rolling release style.

    Debian testing might also work for you. But it will have a freeze window before each release.

    [–] this_is_router@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

    As will have debian unstable. That's the way it goes, for a few months every few years it slows down until the new stable gets released. Testing is just 10 days after unstable to avoid the biggest bugs.

    Never had big problems with debian unstable in 15 years though, as long as you use apt-listbugs

    [–] hadi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    sparky Linux is based on Debian and it has stable and rolling release