this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
183 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37661 readers
279 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drusas@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought this was The Onion at first.

But Musk is doing a great job of achieving his goal of killing Twitter. I wonder who paid or blackmailed him enough for it to be worth the 44 billion?

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were one of the largest investors in Twitter before the purchase. Musk said he would buy it, then tried to back out, and his hand was forced

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how would they threaten him? What’s leverage could they have against someone on the other side of the world who has the means to protect himself by paying security etc.

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

By doing exactly what happened: he made legal claims that he would buy, then tried to back out. He could not legally do so and the house of saud sued to make sure he went through on his intentions. Which forced Musk to do so. It was quite a legal kerfuffle