this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10176 readers
133 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article is literally about the opposite happening though, so your comment reads both as a total non-sequitur and like you didn't read even the headline.

[–] coolin@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The comment is trying to point out, albeit obtusely, that democrats have also funded crazy people on opposite end of the political spectrum. In 2022 the democrats funded far right candidates in hopes they would win the primary and be an easy victory royale for the dem candidate. The comment is trying to analogize these two things, which is fair because it is a similar political strategy.

[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Trump actually was one of those candidates. However, I don't think it is directly analogous. Trump won and it was bad for Democrats. If RFK wins on the other hand, it would certainly be good for Republicans.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry you didn't understand the point I was making at all.