this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1229 points (94.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21041 readers
646 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Flumsy@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You also need the flag "--no-preserve-root".

    [–] Silejonu@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

    No you don't.

    rm -fr / requires the flag, but rm -fr /* does not.

    [–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I think that is only if you pass /, I don't think the flag is required for /* which is what is shown here - if I remember right, it's because the * triggers the shell to expand the paths and that flag is only built to protect / (from say, having an empty variable alongside /).

    [–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 3 points 1 year ago

    Yes, the * is expanded by the shell so the rm command just sees lots of individual files being passed in