this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
503 points (96.8% liked)

3DPrinting

15629 readers
324 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it's pointing at.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If any of those (conspicuously unnamed) household items were used to kill even half as many people as guns, there would absolutely be legislation to reduce the public safety risk.

If that legislation failed as routinely as America's gun laws do, it would be improved or replaced until it worked.

[–] EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Say goodbye to your pipe clog cleaner.

Baking lye roll at home? That's NaOH too.

Old car battery or battery acid somewhere? H2SO4

Chlorix? People have accidently killed themself by releasing Chlorine. That's why there are warnings to not mix it with other cleaning agents.

There is far more in a normal household and don't even touched on the old stuff still laying around.

You might say those are not lethal: Panic is a strong weapon and an attacker has the advantage that he chooses the where, when and how with as much planning/preperation as he likes.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yet with all these amazing weapons of mass destruction in their pantry, every single domestic terrorist just goes and buys a gun instead.

I'm sure the executives over at Chlorox are thrilled to hear that if radicalised psychopaths started killing and maiming thousands of people a year with their products, you'd fight to protect their profits.

But I'm not interested in solving every vague act of violence you're able to inflict on the people in your imagination, I'm interesting in solving the violence that is happening right now, to real people, using a specific tool.

[–] EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The British have an issue with acid attacks. Absolutely devastating to a life: Death is death. It's just over. Those people on the other hand life for years with it and will never fully recover.

Oh, current Clorix accidents are the results of our lackluster education. Shouldn't be too difficult to understand why hypochlorite releases Chlorine when mixed.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I honestly can't imagine being so self-absorbed that I felt entitled to choose death for other people.

Of course, it's apologist bullshit anyway, which means you've had a single thought about it and decided "job done".

Most people being murdered in America aren't being killed with that level of premeditation. Someone (usually a man) has a gun on their person or laying around their house, they lose control of their emotions, then they shoot someone.

People don't tend to have a cup of acid in their bedside drawer but in the extremely likely event acid attacks became even a fraction of gun deaths, you have my full support to change the laws to address it.

Because I'm not on a death cult.