Unlike the comment on reddit saying this won't reduce crashes, I'm going to point out that it's not designed to. Road to zero is about recognising crashes will happen, this move is about reducing the damage when crashes inevitably occur.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] liv 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't really understand this Matthew-Wilson guy's argument:

"Speed cameras seem like a magic solution, but they're not: they alienate ordinary motorists without affecting the behaviour of the tiny minority who cause most fatal crashes," he said. "The sad fact is: the idiots who cause most fatal accidents tend to ignore speed limits anyway." A 2009 AA analysis of fatal accidents found these crashes were caused by "people who don't care about any kind of rules. These are men who speed, drink, don't wear safety belts, have no valid licence or WoF – who are basically renegades."

And then he says

Matthew-Wilson said he favoured speed advisory signs, which simply show motorists what speed they're doing, without issuing a ticket.

"The fact is, most drivers will slow down if you remind them that they're going too fast."

So he's saying people obey road signs, and speeding is only really done by these special outlaw people who dgaf about anything we do so there's no point in even trying?

I kind of wonder what he's basing this theory on.

He cites that study from 16 years ago but if they are able to categorize these people then surely catching them and taking them off the roads would be a good idea?

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Matthew is a lead-foot and doesn't want to change, because he is 'a safe driver' who always 'drives to the conditions'. He knows that speed limits are set 'for the people with the worst reaction times' and an accident 'will never happen to him' because he is a great driver.

Source:
I was Matthew when I was 19. Whether we want to admit it or not, a lot of us were. There are good reasons why insurance is more expensive for drivers that age.

[–] liv 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember LTSA ran a campaign about that back in the 2000s. One stat that stood out to me was that over half of people estimate that they themselves are an "above average" driver...