Free and Open Source Software

17953 readers

163 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

What is the point of Flatpak, AppImage, Snap, etc? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by hypevhs@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't understand what problem they are meant to solve. If you have a FOSS piece of software, you can install it via the package manager. Or the store, which is just a frontend for the package manager. I see that they are distribution-independent, but the distro maintainers likely already know what's compatible and what your system needs to install the software. You enjoy that benefit only through the package manager.

If your distro ships broken software because of dependency problems, you don't need a tool like Flatpak, you need a new distro.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AdminWorker@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Linux purist is to provide the source code and you download then compile the small files.

Developers and gamers don't have storage issues so the higher storage size of flapak and the lack of dependency issues (a copy of every library used) make flatpak user friendly enough for normies aka gamers with steamdecks

[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ahhh those were the days:

tar -xzf PACKAGE.tar.gz

cd PACKAGE

./configure

make

make install

Not sure many people do that any more. I rather prefer:

sudo apt-get install PACKAGE

Or just pick it from synaptic. If you didn't have to do manual integration, plopping down an AppImage has some attractions too.