this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
205 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
33 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
205
askBeehaw: should copyright even exist at all? and if it should, how long should the ideal term of copyright be? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

a perennial favorite topic of debate. sound off in the replies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] N0_Varak@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't patent things that aren't a process or a product, so no you can't patent genes.

Patents take quite a bit of effort to write up if you really want to protect your intellectual property, and their scope is pretty narrow. The patent holder can also license with interested parties if they want.

[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

You can't patent things that aren't a process or a product, so no you can't patent genes.

Genes can be sliced and spliced with methods such as CRISPR. The genetic code that has been artificially transformed by such methods qualifies as a "product". Yes, genes can be patented.