this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
205 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
33 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

a perennial favorite topic of debate. sound off in the replies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skooshjones@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but you don't need copyright for that. You can just have a registry of works or many other solutions that don't involve all the baggage and nonsense of copyright.

[–] F4stL4ne@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need a law of some kind, that will make clear the relationship between the author and the work. A simple registry is just there to retain informations, it doesn't make magically people care about things... Laws are better for this.

[–] Skooshjones@vlemmy.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In what way would you be "making clear the relationship?" Like restrict usage?

[–] F4stL4ne@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yes or granting usage. Being an author isn't always about forbidding, it can be about changing the work or adapting it as well.

The author can defend the work against uses that would change the meaning of the work itself (integrity).

Lastly, the author can't deny the work is his own. And for a bunch of artist this is a bummer.

All this is more of an author's right thing, but I think it's slowly coming to copyright laws as well (online publication).