this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
298 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37648 readers
369 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just an example: If Apple simply wants to turn your iPhone into a brick, it can do that and there is no one who can reverse it.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Um. No they can't. The class action lawyers would have a field day with that.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They already do so with apps.

If Apple deems the app too old, then it won't be compatible and is as useful as a brick.

[–] Stormyfemme@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

You know I have software on my PC old enough I can't run it even in compatibility mode, I'd need to spin up a VM to run it or a pseudoVM like DOSBox, it's not unheard of it's not even uncommon.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

they have the power to do it, is what I'm saying