this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
142 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

34669 readers
486 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I actually like the chaoticness, because I don't like having one small group of people as the self-appointed and de-facto gatekeepers of AI for everyone else. This makes it clear to everyone why it's important to control your own AI resources.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Accelerationism is human sacrifice. It only works if it does damage... and most of the time, it only does damage.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not wanting a small group of self-appointed gatekeepers is not the same as accelerationism.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

... the goal is not what makes it acceleration.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Accelerationism" is a philosophical position. The goal is entirely what makes it accelerationism. Quit swapping words in each new comment.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For fuck's sake. You want bad things to happen... so good things happen, later. Bad shit happening is the part that's objectionable. Saying 'but I want good things' isn't fucking relevant to why someone's hassling you about this!

The bad shit you want to happen first is the only part that's real!

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You want bad things to happen

No, that's entirely you assuming things about my position. I don't want bad things to happen.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I actually like the chaoticness

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it is having a good outcome, the disruption of of a monopoly.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Do you have object permanence?

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm with you there, I just hope the general public come to that realization.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just like it did with climate change?

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago