this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
928 points (94.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
593 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

like I went to taco bell and they didn't even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don't get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 264 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That’s the end result of a capitalist system once corporations have superseded governments in power. It will only get worse.

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, we may be at checkmate. Unlike the end of the age of the robber barons, when we reformed capitalism in the late 1800s / early 1900s in the US... this time the capitalists have purchased enough politicians to stop reform completely and forever.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 127 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

What's funny is that this is entirely unsustainable. If they were in any way a real "capitalist" they would realize that the creeping authoritarianism they're pushing destroys economies long-term. They're laughing all the way to the bank right now because they're not concerned with the future.

However, they should be, because this House of Cards can easily collapse with the right push. They literally can't see past the profits at the end of the next quarter.

They literally can't imagine that all of them choosing to undermine capitalist principles at the same time will result in capitalism failing completely. The only reason it even functioned as well as it did for so long was 1. regulation and 2. raping the third world for resources.

I mean, I'm a fucking leftist, and it makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills that things are so far gone that I'm actually arguing "if we're going to do capitalism, we may as well do it in a way that it actually functions properly" as if that is a fucking fringe idea here.

The wheels are about to fly off this fuckin turkey.

[–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep! And their short-sighted greed is going to drive us right to the brink of annihilation. We’re staring down the barrel of environmental collapse and our leaders are generally either old enough they assume they’ll die before it gets β€œthat bad,” and the others stupidly think money makes them immune to the destruction of the biosphere. Anyone under 50 right now is going to live through some incredibly dark times. We are all dogs in a car with the windows closed and the heater on in a Texas parking lot. Business as usual is going to get really ugly, really quickly, really soon.

The car's on fire and there's no driver at the wheel

And the sewers are all muddied with a thousand lonely suicides

And a dark wind blows

The government is corrupt

And we're on so many drugs

With the radio on and the curtains drawn

We're trapped in the belly of this horrible machine

And the machine is bleeding to death

The sun has fallen down

And the billboards are all leering

And the flags are all dead at the top of their poles

It went like this:

The buildings tumbled in on themselves

Mothers clutching babies picked through the rubble

And pulled out their hair

The skyline was beautiful on fire

All twisted metal stretching upwards

Everything washed in a thin orange haze

I said: "kiss me, you're beautiful -

These are truly the last days"

You grabbed my hand and we fell into it

Like a daydream or a fever

We woke up one morning and fell a little further down -

For sure it's the valley of death

I open up my wallet

And it's full of blood

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately their house of cards is built on a foundation of wealth...and not just fuck you money, but literal centuries of fuck you money.

The fortune 50 I worked for could literally stop doing all business and maintain their current spend for a century and still be solvent.

This isn't unstable at all...it's built to last for 100s of years...the current leaders to their grandkids will be safe.

To further that...the 1% have private armies and well stocked bunkers to ride out any social uprising. That's the really scary stuff.

We are all fucked though. Enjoy the hunger games.

[–] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those armies are going to want to be paid and that'll be hard to do once currency has no meaning. If we are going to go that route. As a matter of fact, a bunch of the 1% have recently had meetings with "experts" on ways to keep their hired mercenaries from turning on them once things truly collapse.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

once currency has no meaning.

You really think those bunkers are filled with cash Scrooge McDuck style? They'll have food, guns, and likely lots of gold. They'll also very likely be sustainable.

Keeping the mercs fed and happy is a trivial thing.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what future?? why would they think of anything long term?

they are cashing in while earth can still support human life.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the thing, though, they don't care about the future. They only want to maximize today's profits.

Tomorrow is someone else's problem.

I don't know how to solve this problem without a massive peiod of hardship for everyone until the societal parasites finally feel the pain , but the cause is pretty obvious.

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 6 points 1 year ago

Money can be an addiction. billionares are basically junkies with mental problems, do not expect them to follow any sense or logic

[–] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you! I've been reading the responses and many of them hit the mark, but yours is the only one mentioning the sbortsightedness of it all. My brother and I have had many conversations about this subject and agree that part of it has to be some kind of collective brain misfire for the lack of a better phrase, that happens to organisms that get to the level we're at, since everything that we build moves faster than evolution will allow our brains to adapt to, and while we see all of this as a mistake we've made or a small subset of us being greedy and upsetting the apple cart, I posit that it is just our species finally reaching a bottleneck that all species eventually face. We just artificially pushed the ceiling further and further upward so we didn't see it. I think we are starting to see it though and it's unlikely that we can do anything to stop from hitting it now.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

we may as well do it in a way that it actually functions properly" as if that is a fucking fringe idea here

Yes, CIA, this post right here.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This goes back to the original sin. It's stupid to be evil and greedy. The latter is the foundation is their entire ideology is built on the former is the mortar holding together the bricks of other people's labor their house is built on.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh, didn't the rich rather famously buy political influence back then as well?

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but not at the same scale. They've become masters at it in the modern age.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, from what I’ve read about political machines in the gilded age it was really just as bad back then.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People worked 12 hour shifts 6 days a week back then with no minimum wage. A lot of people lived in company towns and didn't even get paid in real money. Child labor was legal and widespread, although some shit hole states are getting back to that.

Things are bad now but anyone who thinks it's as bad as it was in the gilded age is either delusional or extremely ignorant. There's a reason the progressive era happened, people were pushed beyond their limits and propaganda couldn't make up for that anymore.

It helps that the field of psychology has come a long way, and it helps further that being a psychologist to help people pays peanuts, but being a psychologist who helps write ad campaigns to make sure the ads have the most psychological impact pressuring people to buy pays big bucks.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hey man, the FTC is doing anti-trust like nobody's business for the first time since gods-know-when. It's not a silver bullet, but it's progress for the first time in forever!

[–] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Time to sharpen the guillotines again..

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only 45 upvotes, Lemmy be slipping.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're slowly hemorrhaging users. Pretty much all of us upvoted it.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have noticed. Imma post even harder now. /s

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

POST HARDER!

(I've been posting hard for a while. It gets a bit dispiriting tbh)

[–] bmsok@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd love to see a rise in quality OC. Migrating and reposting content isn't always the answer.

Other platforms have an undeniable wealth of knowledge and a history that's over a decade long.

That doesn't mean we can't make something great out of this. I just know that I'm not the best content producer.

[–] DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, hypothetically. That is the end result of the neoliberal, or late capitalism economic philosophy if applied on a model. But economic systems in practice are never the philosophy, and are only there in the first place to support the governance of a nation state. I spend half my time in Italy, for example, where the laws protect both the big international brands and the mom and pop shops.

My point is that we are the citizens that make up the government that designs the governance rules for our nation-state. Capitalism is not a government, or people, or the entire story when it comes to commerce and trade systems. We can shape it and use it, like any other framework.

Likewise, regardless of your economic system, greedy people will try to accumulate power, bend the rules to benefit themselves, and extend those benefits across borders if they can. Powerful egos will warp people and rules around them like gravity. All governance systems that strive to be just, collaborative and promote the quality of life of all its citizens have to both put strong rules in place to check the power-hungry, and constantly monitor and adapt to keep them in check.

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"...we are the citizens that make up the government that designs the governance rules for our nation-state."

No we're not. We only have the illusion of control where we are allowed to vote on how to tinker with the outer edges of a system that is in reality controlled by 0.1% of the population.

Certainly the end result of financialised capital.