this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
6 points (80.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1658 readers
8 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Shocking. Yet another example of kicking maintenance and upgrades down the road to save money now, and end up costing more later than it should.
Is that what happened? I only got vagueness from the article but it sounds like the boats aren't the cost blowout, but rather either scope creep or poor planning of the port/dock part of the project.
That's right, the boats aren't the issue, it's the port infrastructure. With the cost increases, the infrastructure at each end will be equivalent to the cost of both boats.
If we're spending billions on the infrastructure, could we revisit moving the docking from Picton to near Blenheim? It vastly shortens the route and makes fast ferries viable again.
Picton can be an idyllic tourist town, rather than 50% industrial.