this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
776 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38824 readers
2273 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Calls are growing for the UN Security Council to be reformed after the US became the only member to use its veto power to block a Gaza ceasefire resolution, a move welcomed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The UN chief says he will keep pushing for peace.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] radix@lemmy.world 194 points 10 months ago (39 children)

Nothing changed on the UNSC when Russia vetoed the resolution to leave Ukraine.

I'm not educated enough to say which is a "worse" violation of the principles the UN stands for, but I'll go out on a limb and say nothing will change this time, either.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 60 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, the whole idea of countries being able to veto UN resolutions are leading to exactly this, Russia vetoing all resolutions condemning their aggression in Ukraine and the US vetoing all resolutions concerning Israel.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure how a resolution condemning anything is helpful, and I don’t know why Israel and Hamas need the UN for a cease fire.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The "resolution" the UN needs to come to here, in my opinion, is to put the whole area (Israel and Palestine) under UN control until something equitable can be worked out.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

UN control is notorious for not working out well, and liking children too much.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not working out well compared to what's happening now? And you think children are being protected from anything now?

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, of course not. There is just a very poor reputation for UN Peace keeping forces, so giving them martial law in one of the most contested places in the world might not end any better.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 25 points 10 months ago

Who's to say the call for reform is only motivated by the most recent ridiculous veto?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m not educated enough to say which is a “worse” violation of the principles the UN stands for, but I’ll go out on a limb and say nothing will change this time, either.

Russia wants to annex a country. Israel is fighting a terrorist group. Russia is worse.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Russia wants to annex a country. Israel is fighting a terrorist group.

Isreal has been slowly annexing bits of Palestine for decades. Those terrorists are the latest reaction to that.

Not that their violence against Israel is a good thing - far from it, but it's also not surprising.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Skates@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Russia wants to annex a country. Israel is ~~fighting~~ a terrorist group.

load more comments (36 replies)