this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
776 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38824 readers
1957 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Calls are growing for the UN Security Council to be reformed after the US became the only member to use its veto power to block a Gaza ceasefire resolution, a move welcomed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The UN chief says he will keep pushing for peace.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] radix@lemmy.world 194 points 10 months ago (49 children)

Nothing changed on the UNSC when Russia vetoed the resolution to leave Ukraine.

I'm not educated enough to say which is a "worse" violation of the principles the UN stands for, but I'll go out on a limb and say nothing will change this time, either.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 60 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Yes, the whole idea of countries being able to veto UN resolutions are leading to exactly this, Russia vetoing all resolutions condemning their aggression in Ukraine and the US vetoing all resolutions concerning Israel.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 25 points 10 months ago

Who's to say the call for reform is only motivated by the most recent ridiculous veto?

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 87 points 10 months ago

Which will be vetoed by all permanent members of the security council.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago (8 children)

The problem in this case is depending on the security council to act on an issue it isn't designed to address.

The main purpose of the UN is to prevent global war, and the Security Council is the primary way in which that goal is achieved.

In that context, the P5's veto power makes sense. It prevents resolutions pitting the world against one of the superpowers that can sustain that kind of war.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago (15 children)

American here, I support this call.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So there were no "calls for reform" after a similar Russian veto about Artsakh in 2020 or recently. If nobody cares about that, then why should I care about anything else really.

[–] serratur@lemmy.wtf 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There has been "calls for reform" almost every time Russia has vetoed

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There shouldn't be a security council

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›