this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
605 points (87.8% liked)

Gaming

2953 readers
50 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jank@literature.cafe 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because a lot of games have a story of some sort and traits can help flesh out a character?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Okay, but then leave it ambiguous and let people think of the character whatever they want. It doesn't matter if doomguy was gay, it matters that he slays

[–] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

And then of the characters significant other is important? Like they complained about Spimer-Man 2, despite the playable characters not even being gay. We know that because we know who they are after.

It Takes Two. Me and my boyfriend played it. Beautiful game. Loved it. Plan to wait a few years and play it with him again. It's about a straight couple. I can't imagine how that game would work if we didn't know that. Like I guess we could keep stretching the argument to "Well they could be bi", I guess. We don't need to know that. But it kind of helps to know they're married to know the story. Otherwise it's gonna get weird with the kid involved.

We don't have to try and out progressive everyone for everything. A story can have a romance and we can see the romance and we can know who they're dating and we can know they're sexuality. None of this is the issue.

Your example would make sense in Doom. Sure. I've literally never seen anyone ask for it in doom. It's a terrible example because it's not that kind of game.

But for many games where the story is actually a big part, and not for games like Doom where the story really doesn't matter, it's fine. We can still celebrate love in really any shape or form(thats not harmful). If a game wants to avoid it, thats also fine. Once again, not arguing every game needs it. But if that's the story, that's the story, and it seems pointless to be angry that you know who a character is dating.

The movement for queer acceptance isn't for people to be hush hush and for us to make the closet bigger to invite straight people in. It's to get people out.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

That's an interesting one because I actually always headcannon doom guy as gay ever since I was a kid and it was just being silly, always pictured him as a badass marine that loves sucking cock and he's fighting his way to hell because his bf died and was sent there.

Duke Nukem on the other hand was explicitly hetro which is fun, I would have also enjoyed in a different game a character like the duke who was aggressively homosexual or even better a good representation of a ego obsessed badass power bottom that has all sorts of fun quips like 'I'm here to suck cock and kick ass, and I already drained everyone's balls...' it would be silly, fun, and we could have lots of shots of his toned butt and stuff... But no, thirty years later and people are still scared of fun. Sad.

:::

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't he slay more fabulously though, if he was gay?

He killed demons with a chainsaw, the man has style