linuxmemes

A respectable rebuttal. Nicely done. Here are some of my responses.

What did you need to set for KeepassXC? The flathub version and fedora RPM just work.

QT_QPA_PLATFORM=wayland

You can modify flatpak permissions easily in KDE or using Flatseal though, to remove a lot and especially restrict keepassXC to only readwrite one directory.

I prefer my distro's repos whenever possible. But good to know.

• Openoffice is discontinued and Libreoffice is the modern Openoffice.

But it works on X. I like using alternatives to the big players in any and all tech spaces. That's why I use Open Office. That's why I want an alternative office suite that works on Wayland to actually compete with Libreoffice(that isn't the online office suites, etc. We appear to be in agreement on that one). But good point, not a Wayland problem. I'll acquiesce to you on that one.

I have no idea why Wayland should cut down your choices. Use XOrg if you want, nobody stopping you, it is simply unmaintained for years pretty much.

I'm not arguing to use Xorg per se, though I can see my arguments being interpreted that way. I'm arguing that the switch to Wayland is more trouble than it's worth right now for some people, and to say Wayland is ready for all is disingenuous, and to somehow look down on those who simply want to keep using X is a shitty thing to do.

There are TWMs for Wayland and they are said to work (have a look at wayblue), I use KDE and tried GNOME and both work. Use any weird old TWM through rootful XWayland if you really want to. This is not waylands problem, X.org is old spaghetticode that nobody wanted to maintain, and there still is no rise in contributions even with all those self-entitled Linux Experts complaining about their weird old nieche Desktop being abandoned.

No argument that X is abandoned, no argument it's spaghetti code. No argument that Wayland is the future. I'm just saying it's not quite the present either. Diversity within the Linux community is a good thing dude. Customizable work flows are awesome for everybody, that's one of the things that makes Linux so much better than the alternatives. I can't wait for Wayland to get to the point where it has that many weird possible workflows going on the way X does right now. That way we can have all the security and no screen tearing you want, with the insane amount of customization options I want.

Personally I want BSPWM and sxhkd on Wayland for the same low RAM cost. River is close, and I'm hoping it gets there, but unless I know c, zig, or rust, I'm not going to be able to customize it to the way I have BSPWM out of the box. Is this Wayland's problem? Hell no! But if I have all I want on X, why switch?

Nearly (?) all development is done for XWayland, which is normally used in rootless mode, but you can use it rootfull too, and run a complete XOrg Window manager on a minimalist Wayland compositor. Brody Robertson made a video about that.

I love Brodie's channel, and that was a great episode! That said, the fact that so much backporting has to be done through xwayland is an unfortunate necessity. If everything just works on X, and I still need a translation layer on top of Wayland to use what already just works, then why not just wait until everything just works on Wayland? Or just use both?

I know you're not saying this, but a lot of the sentiment online seems to be ”stop using X entirely now! Wayland is the future because everybody says so. You use Nvidia? Stop! Your favorite app doesn't work on Wayland? Just use xwayland!" The sentiment is so emphatic, it fails to acknowledge that some entire workflows have been built up around these older applications where no security breaches were encountered, little to no screen tearing was even noticed, and basically no problems occurred. Why bash on these people with this noise when at the end of the day, we just want to get shit done on our computers efficiently, and if X gets us there quicker, and Wayland doesn't, then why switch right now? Especially considering the Wayland enthusiasts have to argue so hard to convince me it all just works when it clearly works on YOUR machine, and hasn't for at least me and also a good number of users? Meanwhile nobody's arguing that despite X's flaws...everything pretty much has worked for a while now.

XWayland is automatically used for all Apps without Wayland support. I never used Gamescope but suppose this is nice, but I dont care about Gaming as I wasted way too much time of my life there. If you want to game, use uBlue Bazzite and call it a day. Its a modern Distro, based on Fedora, using Wayland, made for steamdecks and also PCs.

I actually have little to say on the state of Gaming on Wayland. I have played Cyberpunk on Steam with proprietary Nvidia drivers on Wayland and it looks okay. Once Nvidia fixes the stuttering issues that hit in 545, I'll have no complaints on that. But I only play a single game, so I can't speak to that too much (others have pointed out in this very chat better insights in this regard).

I never set a single flag for anything and have no idea how Wayland works, but I used it since at least 1½ years.

That's good dude. I genuinely look forward to the day when this is the norm.

I have no idea why people would want to do that? There is literally the high likeliness of backdoors in your damn GPU driver, allowing the green team to see everything you do.

Are you going to also criticize Linux users who then use any proprietary software? Is your pure FOSS system running GNU boot and Parabola Linux? I'm not going to defend nvidia the company, but their users who want support on Linux shouldn't be told to just chuck their old cards and go AMD. There are many good reasons why they can't/won't do that, and it's not just gaming or cost. They want CUDA support for AI and also:

Why use Linux if you entire Graphics are using a proprietary black box?

Because I bought one before I knew about the Linux ecosystem and the issues with Nvidia and don't want to contribute to Ewaste if I can help it. Yes I can afford an AMD GPU, and one day, when my Nvidia GPU craps out, I'll buy one, but why spend the money, time, and effort to replace a perfectly working GPU solely for Wayland support? You listed some good reasons why, it's just not enough for me personally and probably for others as well.

Wayland is ready. I have no idea of developing Apps, but I suppose just using a good Toolkit is the start. If you are lazy just use Electron, but Qt works just as well cross-platform, if you are fancy use Slint. We can argue if developing apps for Linux is ready.

I'm sorry, you're adamant that Wayland is ready, but are willing to argue if developing apps for Linux is ready? This seems counterintuitive. Bur yeah, intuititons are often wrong, care to elucidate on why Wayland is somehow ready but app development might not be?

I think there are bigger problems like good easy IDEs (only GNOME has one) for Linux, or the packaging issue that is fixed by Flathub. Wayland is just a change.

This seems like a Linux problem and not an X or Wayland problem. But hey, the Libreoffice argument I made was based on this same unrelated logic, so I'll digress.

Again, I'm not arguing that Wayland isn't the future. What I'm saying is that, even now, it's not ready yet. It's closer than ever and there's obviously a big push to have Wayland everywhere, so it's coming one way or another.

I maintain a repo with a list of recommended, modern software

Thanks. I'll check this out later.

Projects like Bluerecorder are nice and very alpha on Wayland, here I agree they are struggling to make it work but it works. Using OBS for minimalist screen recording is huge bloat.

Also will have to check this out, thanks.