this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)
NZ Politics
564 readers
1 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To my knowledge, two, which is enough. But anyway, how many people never leave Wellington? And I don't think it matters if people mistake it for a road name.
I considered this, and I don't think it would make a substantial difference. If you didn't have Te Ara Puaki on the sign, then the 111 operator will have to deal with someone who doesn't know the name at all. And as soon as they say where they are, if they remember this name it will probably make it easier for the operator to find them.
Remember, when someone calls and says they are on Queen St or Church St, that's way less information than Te Ara Puaki Expressway. As soon as they are more specific with the area, then your argument about how few expressways there are now works in their favour. As far as I can tell, there are just 6 in the whole country.
I'd guess it's probably based on international signs that were part of the research into the safety of bilingual signs. I don't really have a problem with the design. It's just words conveying information. Maybe they could be better but I don't have a better design to prove it.
Yes we do, the Irish road signs, which italicise Irish, are an example of this idea done far better.
Haha yes, I also saw those responses after writing this. Italics for one does seem like a good idea to differentiate them.