this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
21 points (78.4% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
636 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to share a picture or GIF with my friend on Telegram, but I don't want to do it directly. What can I use?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Define "safely". That means different things to different people.

Telegram has their secure chat, which is fully E2E.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

Only on mobile, and hidden opt-in

Better drop that BS platform

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

It does, but it's in a very malicious fashion. You need to activate something called "Secret Chat" for a given chat conversation. Only then is it E2EE. Otherwise, it's unencrypted like discord n stuff.

[–] someoneFromInternet@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't trust telegram because they have closed servers.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

And you still haven't answered the question.

Define safely. We really can't help until we known what you're trying to do

[–] someoneFromInternet@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just want the telegram to not have access to the photo. Otherwise, I would use other methods to transmit it.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Theoretically, they don’t have access to the photos even though they’re running the server between. That’s what end to end encryption means, it’s encrypted on your end and decrypted on the recipients end.

Unless the middle man in question retains both your and the recipients encryption keys, they can’t read the messages. This requires trusting the vendor in question.

However the only alternative to trusting a vendor is not only purchasing your own equipment, but also deploying it on your property, and building and maintaining your own isolated physical connections between those locations. This is what nation states and militaries do, the US military has an entirely physically separate and independent “internet”.

There’s a concept in information security not to spend more protecting information than that information is worth. Your gifs are probably not worth the effort of building your own infrastructure, unless you’re sending some highly sketchy content.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to come off as retarded but I have to ask: when did Signal get this bad rep? I remember not too long ago that it and Telegram were praised for their privacy practices. What happened for that to change?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago

Signal requires a phone number. I'm not sure about telegram