this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1425 readers
175 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
9
Jakob Nielsen is betting it all on gen AI (web.archive.org)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by fasterandworse@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is not so much about a particular post but rather to document Jakob Nielsen's relentless generative AI boosting.

His weekly updates are so saturated with AI subject matter and every image is AI generated they are unreadable and I can only assume the text is AI generated as well. It really doesn't matter if it isn't, in fact, because he's demonstrating in real-time how damaging the AI aesthetic is to a brand.

He also seems to be mentioning his 40 years of expertise a lot more, which might be a reaction to some negative feedback. I want to dig deeper, but I don't like the feeling that I'll have to read generated stuff carefully.

His latest newsletter triggered this post because he links to a terrible AI generated song he made (with the line "Jakob Nielsen with UX fame, forty-one years, still in the game") and spends most of the newsletter talking about the process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYt12jr5yUY

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

one of the key goals of AI-generated songs is to populate the long tail of domain-specific content

I'm so glad I have no idea what this means because it's surely stupid and awful.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If I were to guess (shoot me if I’m mansplaining) he’s suggesting we use AI in cultural niches to generate content. i.e. the thing where AI doofuses think it’s cool to automate the fun parts of human experience out of our hands.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You know you’ve done bad when you create the conditions for “got to give him credit for putting the work in” to this guy https://youtu.be/JZYZoQQ6LJQ

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hate that you linked that and I hate that I clicked on it.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But you have to give him credit for putting the work in

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 9 months ago

the comments on that video are exceptionally cringe

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 9 months ago

Thanks, hate it. Amazing how much of it is just either 'im rich!' or 'buzzword'.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

i lasted 27 seconds

[–] carlitoscohones@awful.systems 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Skip to 1:03 for a second ... this is the super-fast lyric portion of the video. Saying all of those syllables fast causes Mr. street-sounding rap guy to lose his accent code-switch and for that verse he sounds like a generic white guy. Pretty funny actually.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 9 months ago

i'll pass thanks

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He made a mil on pocket change

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 9 months ago

Ah, easy mistake to make: it’s a mill on pocket change

Teensy tiny model mill, on a stand of pocket change! Adorbs

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 11 points 9 months ago

I like playing with these generative models but they're strictly for making weird pictures and stupid songs. Seeing the usage these very serious people make of it it's like they're looking into Fisher-Price hardware for the office.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 9 months ago

spam, spam, spam