this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
127 points (100.0% liked)

Emulation

3569 readers
5 users here now

Community to talk about emulation & roms.

RULES:

1.) No bigotry

LINKS:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd think companies like Sony do care if people buy or not

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a niche gizmo they're selling for a healthy profit. The break-even point has to be very low. They want some people to buy it. But they don't care if you buy it.

They don't need to spend money supporting it because it's strictly local. If it was a new PSP, there'd be a whole storefront, and updates, and complex risk assessment for how much to spend for expected returns. There'd be a huge marketing push to ensure they hit some lofty goal for sales figures.

But this is a split controller glued to a shite Android tablet. It's low-risk. It could have sold zero units and they'd shrug off a minor loss. They don't expect it to sell a zillion units, and they don't need it to sell a zillion units. It's there for anyone who wants one.

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think developing and selling a whole hardware device is quite so trivial, but I also doubt that it would mean they don't mind taking losses on it. This is not a new market that would be worth risking a loss to get a headstart, people could even get the same experience with... a tablet and a split controller, which has a lot more functionality.

I don't know what's your point with "they don’t care if you buy it". Of course they don't have a department keeping track of one single guy. Sounds like you are taking criticism of this device personally.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, Sony can go fuck themselves, and consoles as a concept need to end. I'm only pointing out that poor sales will not matter in the slightest. I am speaking to people who keep asking, 'why would I want this?' and if you have to ask, the answer is, you wouldn't. And so what.

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here's the thing. Of course sales matter. Sony is not only a for profit company but one that is not particularly inclined to play around just to be different (like Nintendo). Saying sales don't matter just does not make sense.

Besides, people are not just lamenting that it isn't a full-blown portable console, but it's also not integrated with the Playstation Now cloud gaming service, so the use case is so limited as to be baffling. It shouldn't have been much more costly to make it capable of playing cloud games.

You are asking people "so what", and they are telling you what. Good for you if this is good enough for you. It doesn't mean everyone else gotta just agree or say nothing. This is a discussion thread. The most that one might say is that the discussion has strayed away from emulation, but then again I don't think arguing what it's originally intended for contributes much to that either.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the use case is so limited as to be baffling.

Only if you're not listening. Some discussions are supposed to end, when their questions reach answers. People ask why anyone would buy this, and the answer is, to play their PS5 without their TV. People ask why it doesn't do more, and the answer is, because that would cost Sony more money, requiring higher sales figures to break even.

This object is this way because limited scope means poor sales will not matter. No shit Sony wants to sell some. No shit they'd be thrilled if it sold eight billion units. But they don't need that. It is a project with low up-front costs, low marketing costs, and low upkeep costs. If it was higher-risk then it probably would not exist.

It is a completely optional accessory for PS5 owners. They don't want it to be anything more.

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Nah. I'm listening, I just don't agree that you get to decide when the discussion gets to end. You are just repeating yourself at this point, but folks aren't satisfied simply with responses of why someone ought to buy it when they want to comment on the limitations and missed opportunity.

Additional costs and risk aren't even a reason not to do it, they are merely a consideration to have. Companies choose to take these risks all the time. The PS5 has a whole new VR2 headset even though the market for that is even riskier than a portable device. Yes, it would cost more, and they could have done it anyway.

Besides, a cloud gaming feature wouldn't even raise costs all that much, and it might even lower the risk as an additional selling point.

If you want to tell me that Sony didn't do it because Sony didn't do it and some people bought it because some people bought it, that's not much of an answer.

But you also glossed over the detail that if what people want is to stream their games to a device that's like a cheap tablet with a split controller... they can just use a tablet with a split controller, spending less while also not having weird restrictions such as needing to buy a separate headset for it. Most people who can afford a PS5 already have phones that would do this perfectly well without spending whole $200 on an extra dumb screen.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

They could've, but they didn't.

I've explained why - because people asked.

The same questions, again, will have the same answers.

The fact you're still talking does not make that an ongoing discussion.

If you want to stream games on your phone, do.

That's not what this device is for.

I think we're done here.